|
In 1997 a team from Vancouver, Canada, published a methodology for estimating the impact of the HIV epidemic on the average life expectancies of gay and bisexual men. The team used infection and mortality data from Vancouver and for the period 1987 to 1992.
It had long been difficult for HIV/AIDS researchers to estimate, with gratifying certainty, the impact of the disease on the general population. The difficulties were compounded when estimating the impact on the sub-group of gay and bisexual men because there was little consensus on just how large this sub-group was.
For example, should figures be based on:
- the 2-3% of men who will be open open about their current homosexual behaviour in a survey, or
- the larger group (4-6%) of men who will be open about having had a same-sex relationship during the past 5 to 10 years, or
- the still larger again group of men that will -- at some time in their life -- do so at least once?
Whatever figure is used, and whatever is not, has a considerable impact on epidemiological models for the spread and containment of the disease. This is because of an inherent multiplier effect whenever a small minority is examined and when the base assumptions thereby vary by a factor of -- in this case -- up to 4 or 5.
Attempting to simply side-step any debate about the size of the sub-group of men that are gay/bisexual and yet still be able to provide meaningful data; Hogg et al published a methodology that made the estimations across a range. Readers were able to select their own preferred size for the sub-group. For their purposes, the researchers took figures of 3%, 6% and 9% as the proportion of men that could be classified as gay or bisexual and used these to generate the reported outcomes.
The outcomes reported in this paper have been seized upon by many anti-gay political groups, and in turn quoted ad nauseum on many occasions. The paper has been quoted for as varying reasons as marriage legislation around same-sex couples, influencing sex education in schools and providing reasoning behind ex-gay programs. In general, a quote of "homosexuality cuts 20 years off your life" or "homosexuality is more dangerous than smoking" is usually attributed to this paper; particularly as the use of a parallel claim by the virulently anti-gay (and disreputable) psychologist Paul Cameron has been exposed as a fiction and fallen into disuse.
(As a general rule: when the term "20 years off your life" or similar is used, the claimant is referring to this work by Hogg and his colleagues. Use of words such as "the average age is only 42 years" points to Paul Cameron. Hogg's paper was valid, although now clearly out of date and sorely misused -- it requires a considered response. Cameron's scurrilous work is without any merit, and needs only be rejected out of hand.)
In the time since the data for Hogg's paper was collected a great deal has changed around the demographics of the epidemic. For example, Hogg assumed that 95% of HIV-related deaths were within the homosexual sub-group; and this has both dramatically fallen over the past 15 years and/or was never applicable in the first instance for areas outside Vancouver. Likewise, improved health management since the mid-1990's has considerably extended the average lifespan of HIV-positive individuals.
This page updates the work of Hogg and his colleagues using HIV/AIDS infection data and mortality tables for the 2002/03 period. The base data is for the entire United States, rather than just the the city of Vancouver. We have also examined the impact on three racial sub-groups of gay and bisexual men.
Feel free -- really -- to go through this with a fine tooth comb. The spreadsheet is provided for a reason, and that is to be completely open with the data and workings. grantdale
|